Saturday, February 11, 2012 | 1:46:04 PM
Home | About Us | Privacy Policy | Editorial | Contact Us | Feedback | Anonymous Tip | Advertise | In The Press | RSS
Nose for news? Techgoss pays Rs. 1000 for 250-word news items, photos. Anonymity Guaranteed. Email Editor.     
Just GossComment | 

Farcical H1B report?
By Techgirl

I work full-time as a technology journalist and have also been writing part-time for Techgoss for a number of years.  Like all my colleagues in mainstream Indian media, I have a good idea on how the Indian IT-ITES sector works.

The two factors driving the success of our booming IT-BPO sector are costs and quality.  Underlying these two factors is a highly educated, intelligent workforce. Cost is the main driver especially for our BPO’s.  Like most Indians, I believe that outsourcing is a fact of life in a flat world, and it good for a balanced global economy.

Over the last 8 years,  my sources in the IT-ITES sector have send me tips with documentation showing the paltry amounts they were paid when they first visited clients in USA and Europe.  One BPO which had sent staff to USA was providing shared accommodation, shared transport, food plus a paltry amount of $30 a day.  I have received at least 30 emails from sources which have proof that many Indian IT majors were paying their techies only $40,000 in America while their local counterparts were paid $60,000.  Even the top Indian Analysts and specialists get at least 10-20 percent lesser than their foreign colleagues. 

To their credit, when some companies like Microsoft USA import Indian techies to America, they give them the same salary and perks offered to locals.  There are other companies that do the rights thing, but they are the exception rather than the norm.

Most Indian techies who have migrated via Indian body shops had a hard time when the first reached America.

So, I was shocked when I saw this unbelievable report published by the University of Maryland which bizarrely claimed that Indian techies were paid more than Americans.


The use of H-1B and other work visas to hire foreign information technology (IT) professionals in the United States has attracted significant controversy and policy debates. On one hand, hiring high-skill foreign IT professionals on work visas can be advantageous for U.S. firms and the overall economy. On the other hand, high-skill immigration can adversely impact the wages of foreign and American IT professionals. This study uses data on skills and compensation of more than 50,000 IT professionals in the United States over the period 2000–2005 to study patterns in compensation of foreign and American IT professionals to inform these debates. Contrary to the popular belief that foreign workers are a cheap source of labor for U.S. firms, we find that after controlling for their human capital attributes, foreign IT professionals (those without U.S. citizenship and those with H-1B or other work visas) earn a salary premium when compared with IT professionals with U.S. citizenship. The salary premiums for non-U.S. citizens and for those on work visas fluctuate in response to supply shocks created by the annual caps on new H-1B visas. Setting lower and fully utilized annual caps results in higher salary premiums for non-U.S. citizens and those with work visas. We discuss implications of this study for crafting informed visa- and immigration-related policies by the U.S. government, for staffing practices of firms, and for human capital investments by IT professionals.

This report has been widely published in the Indian media. While many Indian tech leaders have politely disagreed with the report, others have used it to push their self serving point that Indians are not taking jobs away from Americans.  American media have found this report so inaccurate that no one has picked it up.

What is even weirder is that this report is more than 5 years old from the period of 2000-2005.  And the first dot com crash happened in 2000-2002 when tech salaries in America were in freefall.

This reports looks like academic bullshit to me.  It was done for the period of 2000-2005.  The report was finally accepted by the University 4 years later in 2009.  And it was finally published only in May, 2010.

So many years of work not only wasted but plainly wrong.

(Email me at my blog or Techgoss if you have a story tip you want me to follow up)

Techgoss note:  Techgirl is a senior Tech journalist who reports on the IT, KPO and KPO Sectors for a leading media house.  In her spare time, she dabbles in satire in her blog http://techgirltalk.blogspot.com


(5/22/2010)
PrintE-MailDiscussDiggFacebookSaveWrite to Editor
Techgoss Team

Editor: DJ Varma
Email | MSN Messenger

Reporters:
Bala Shah,Nitin Paul,Yasmin Ahmed

Anonymous Tip: Email

Feedback Letters: Email


 
 
Copyright 2010 Techgoss.com
Our Technology Partner: 
Best Viewed in resolution 1024 x 768 pixels